This topic is frequently discussed and occasionally even directly investigated by the
dendrochronology community. You might want to search the archives of the International
Tree Ring Database Forum for past discussions and references. The forum and its archives
are linked to: <http://web.utk.edu/~grissino/forum.htm>.
I give the above reference to past discussions on the topic because there are definitely
different points of view.
Here is my point of view as a pathologist and dendrochronologist that occasionally
dissects trees with deep wound caused by increment borers:
1. How important is the information to be gained? Obviously, this is a judgment call. I
discourage increment boring as a class project. It can provide information useful to
forest research and management. For me, the choice is less about comparing the effects of
increment boring to no injury and more about comparing the relative value of collecting
increment cores versus stem disks.
2. Less injury results from coring healthy, vigorous trees than declining trees. Reduced
injury results from better compartmentalization of infection and decay on the inside and
more rapid closure of the wound.
3. Do not treat the borer wound. Disinfection even if possible would last only a very
brief time. Disinfecting agents (bleach, alcohol, etc.) will kill living wood, bark, and
cambial cells near the wound. There is likely no value in plugging the hole with dowels,
wax, etc. That can obstruct closure of the wound by the formation of new wood.
4. Use sharp tools, both to save your back and shoulders (or motorized power head) and to
provide a cleanly cut wound.
5. Disinfection of the borer between trees is likely not necessary *except* with a small
set of diseases such as, perhaps, fire blight. There are lots of differences of opinion
here. My view is that inoculum of wood-inhabiting fungi is ubiquitous, particularly the
insect-vectored sort, so host response is more important than pathogen exclusion.
6. Keep in mind that boring may release previously compartmentalized, well-develop decay
infections in the core of the tree that can then be released by mechanically breaching
that boundary with the borer.
I have a few citations associated with the above (and a picture of #6) in my article at
http://nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/9076.
Hope this helps!
Kevin
Kevin T. Smith, Ph.D.
Supervisory Plant Physiologist / Project Leader, Research Work Unit NRS-10
USDA Forest Service
271 Mast Road, Durham, NH 03824, USA
Voice: 603.868.7624 Fax: 603.868.7604
Cell: 207.351.5671
Email: ktsmith(a)fs.fed.us
From: rg70200-forpath-bounces(a)lists.iufro.org
[mailto:rg70200-forpath-bounces@lists.iufro.org] On Behalf Of Gregory Gilbert
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 1:03 PM
To: rg70200-forpath(a)lists.iufro.org
Subject: [IUFRO RG 7.02 FORPATH] Preventing infection after coring trees
Greetings Forpathers-
We are about to embark on a very large project that will entail coring a large number (a
couple thousand) tropical rainforest trees to look at fungi decaying the insides of the
trees. The trees are part of a long-term study, and there is significant (and reasonable)
concern that we do no harm to the trees that might speed their demise. As such, there are
very strong opinions about what we should do to the holes after we remove the cores. As
the pathologist on the project, it is my responsibility to provide a clear, evidence-based
rationale for what we do, and I'm seeking Forpath advice on the latest (preferably
with published studies).
I know there is plenty out there about not tarring or painting pruning wounds. I have a
rather old publication on wound healing of cores in tropical trees that showed pretty
rapid sealing of drill wounds (through a variety of mechanisms) (Gilbert and Guariguata
1996 Biotropica 28: 23-29). But I'm not finding much empirical work out there on what
should best be done to handle deep wounds like trunk cores on trees.
Any advice -- your personal observations, citations, rationale for different approaches -
would be greatly appreciated.
What would you do to protect trees from infection after coring?
Thanks very much,
Greg
*************************************************************************************************************************
Gregory S. Gilbert, Ph.D.
Director, SCWIBLES GK-12 Training Program
Professor and Pepper-Giberson Chair tel: (831) 459-5002
http://scwibles.ucsc.edu
Environmental Studies fax: (831) 459-4015
Co-Director, CenTREAD
1156 High St.
ggilbert@ucsc.edu<mailto:ggilbert@ucsc.edu>
http://centread.ucsc.edu<http://centread.ucsc.edu/>
University of California
Research Group
Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
http://people.ucsc.edu/~ggilbert
Si no usas la cabeza, alguien por ti la va a abusar. Rubén Blades
*************************************************************************************************************************
This electronic message contains information generated by the USDA solely for the intended
recipients. Any unauthorized interception of this message or the use or disclosure of the
information it contains may violate the law and subject the violator to civil or criminal
penalties. If you believe you have received this message in error, please notify the
sender and delete the email immediately.